Summary
Homeowners requested permission to pave over 56% of their residential lot for extra parking, but city rules cap impervious surfaces at 50%. After agreeing they could trim the project to fit within the rules, the board denied the oversized plan.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 16, 2026.
Impact analysis
💰Financial impact
None on city funds.
✅Who benefits
The property owners, who can still construct a compliant parking area.
⚠️Who could be affected
None.
Mentions & discussions (1)
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Easton
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.